By Alessia Grunberger


Miri Kahn, left, and Rosheda Harrell work at the Baltimore Child Abuse Center and supported HB72.

Miri Kahn, left, and Rosheda Harrell work at the Baltimore Child Abuse Center and supported HB72.

Advocates and victims convened in Annapolis on Wednesday to testify before the Senate education committee on a measure to raise awareness about sexual assault and abuse in schools.

Sponsored by Del. Eric Luedtke, D-Montgomery, HB 72 would require the State Board of Education and private schools who benefit from the state’s Nonpublic Schools Textbook and Technology Grants program to establish and enforce an age-appropriate program that would educate students about preventing sexual abuse and assault.

Bill supporters urged that teachers should begin instruction on the topics as early as kindergarten or first grade, and the program’s content could be tailored based on age.

“In order to prevent child sexual abuse, one of the most effective things we can do is to make sure that every child receives the message that if they are being inappropriately touched by an adult they need to report it to another responsible adult,” Luedtke said. “We’ve seen case after case after case where if a child had such training, it may have prevented serial abuse from occurring to them and to other children who were abused by the same abuser.”

Supporters, including Baltimore Child Abuse Center and Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault, believe this bill is essential to preventing and ending these abusive vicious cycles.

Opposition to curriculum meddling

While there were no opponents that testified at the committee hearing, opponents, including several state lawmakers — all Republican — voted against the bill in the House of Delegates.

The bill passed the House of Delegates 133-6. The six Republican who were opposed were: Deborah Rey, St. Mary’s; Mark Fisher, Calvert; William Wivell, Washington; Robin Grammer Jr., Baltimore; Neil Parrott,-Washington; and Del. Glen Glass, Harford.

Of the delegates that reached out to, only Rey responded.

She said it is not the job of the General Assembly to decide what a private school’s curriculum should be.

“It is forcing (nonpublic schools) to create a program, and if the nonpublic school wants to create the program, that’s fine,” Rey said. “I just don’t think the state should be using this textbook and technology program to force the nonpublic schools to create a program that they may or may not want to create.”

“It is not usually the practice of the General Assembly to dictate curriculum and that has been one of the arguments against the bill, but we wrote the bill in a very specific way it tracks with other types of curriculum the General Assembly has passed previously,” Luedtke said. “The one exception we tend to make to that rule is when it comes to health and safety.”

This bill passed in the House last legislative session, but it died in the Senate committee which heard the bill again Wednesday.