By Barry Rascovar
Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan can thank his lucky stars the bitter and intractable Republican disputes in Washington sabotaged plans to do away with the nation’s current healthcare plan, the Affordable Care Act.
Passage of the Trumpcare alternative – imposing horrific added costs on older Americans, endangering Medicare funding and removing healthcare coverage for 14 million citizens next year – would have had cataclysmic effects in Maryland and placed Hogan on an untenable political hot seat.
Instead, Hogan gets a slight reprieve, which helps his chances of getting reelected next year.
Then again, if the president and GOP hardliners insist on pressing a second time to wipe out the ACA and succeed, Hogan will be in the bull’s eye when furious Maryland Democrats seek revenge at the polls.
Equally ominous for the first-term Republican governor is Trump’s obsession with making exceedingly deep cuts in the federal budget. Even if Congress ignores the president’s budget submission from last week, the administration has its marching orders – cut personnel wherever possible, cut back severely on spending wherever possible and hold back on doling out money for programs run by the states.
Take, for instance, Trump’s budget that eliminates all federal funds for Chesapeake Bay restoration. Any sizable elimination of funds will infuriate many moderates and independents who voted for Hogan in 2014. Anger toward Trump could be taken out on Hogan on Election Day next year.
The Maryland governor’s silence about Trump’s assault on federal spending isn’t helping him, either. Of course he’s in an unwinnable bind – criticize Trump and Hogan’s conservative followers will feel betrayed; support the president and Democrats will unload on Hogan.
It’s a tough time to be a Republican governor in a heavily Democratic state. Hogan has his work cut out trying to separate himself from a wildly unpopular president without alienating died-in-the-wool Republican voters.
From the “sound and fury signifying nothing” department, here are two items of wasted energy by elected leaders in Annapolis who should know better:
Pointless fracking debate
Environmental activists are in a tizzy over their insistence that hydraulic fracturing of Marcellus shale rock formations deep beneath Garrett County and a portion of Allegany County be forever banned in Maryland.
They’ve made such a stink that Hogan has flip-flopped on the issue – abandoning his efforts to help Republican Western Maryland landowners who might some day benefit from extraction of oil and gas using this “fracking” technique that has been in use for over 60 years.
Yet here’s the reality:
- There is no fracking taking place anywhere in Maryland.
- There is no likelihood of fracking taking place in Maryland any time in the years to come.
- Fracking in Maryland is uneconomical today and will be for a long time to come.
- Regulations proposed by Hogan are so tough that no exploration companies in their right mind will venture into Maryland unless oil prices soar far beyond $100 a barrel – an unlikely scenario thanks to the glut of fracked oil wells in more hospitable, resource-rich regions of the country.
So environmentalists will win this empty victory and Hogan will win over some environmentalists come Election Day – but he might also lose votes from the Western Maryland landowners he betrayed.
Ludicrous “Road Kill Bill” dispute
Both Hogan and lawmakers are in the wrong here.
The governor has completely politicized a law that is so insipid and toothless it’s not worth arguing about.
The law in question has no enforcement provisions and leaves the governor in full control of road-building decisions. All it does is provide a bit of transparency on the relative value of each project being funded.
Hogan’s empty threat of not funding projects because of this law is strictly for next year’s campaign sloganeering. He’s made a mountain out of a teeny molehill just to win political points with rural and suburban voters.
Democratic lawmakers said they were going to amend the law this year to make it even clearer the law is strictly advisory. They also said they would simplify the evaluation process.
Instead, Democrats in the Senate are pushing for a two-year delay in implementing a toothless law while wasting time studying how to make the law even more meaningless.
The whole thing is pointless and a turnoff to voters of all stripes.
Surely the governor and lawmakers can spend the remaining days of this General Assembly session on something that really is constructive and helps Maryland citizens.
Moxie from the mayor
Here’s a shout-out to new Baltimore Mayor Catherin Pugh, who took an unpopular stand because it was the right thing to do.
She vetoed a bill mandating a $15 an hour minimum wage for most workers in the city – a move that would have been an economic calamity for Baltimore.
We all want every worker to take home a decent paycheck. But not if it means businesses will fire personnel, reduce hours for their remaining staff and consider moving across the city-county line.
Those weren’t idle threats when this well-meaning but idealistic bill passed the naively liberal City Council.
Such an ordinance would leave the city deep in debt, according to its own financial analysts, with businesses fleeing to Baltimore and Anne Arundel counties to take advantage of a lower minimum wage, far lower property taxes and lower insurance rates.
Baltimore City must be competitive. The state’s minimum wage already is scheduled to rise this July and in succeeding years, too.
Besides, minimum-wage jobs are not intended to be permanent positions but rather a starting point for people eager to work their way up the economic ladder to more responsible and good-paying jobs with long-term career potential.
Pugh’s veto protects Baltimore’s economic well-being, even if liberal critics unfairly condemn her.
She’s been quiet and withdrawn during her initial months in office. Yet when it truly mattered, Pugh didn’t hesitate to analyze the facts and make a tough, courageous decision.
Barry Rascovar’s blog is www.politicalmaryland.com. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Got the following comment from David Goeller of Cumberland MD
“Mr. Rascovar continues to support fracking in Western Maryland as a way to help landowners in Garrett and Allegany counties.
Can he identify any of these landowners not named Beitzel? I can name him Garrett landowners who oppose fracking and want the ban extended. I find Mr. Rascovar’s reasoning against extending the ban curious. He says it should not be extended because it’s unnecessary: oil interests currently find it uneconomical to operate in the area and won’t find it economical in the foreseeable future, so there is no harm in allowing the ban to expire. Conversely, what’s the harm in extending the ban. If the economics change the issue can be revisited. Gov. Hogan has come around to agree with a majority of Marylanders, who apparently do not consider the ban unnecessary.”
Fracking does take place in Maryland. It is a method used to rejuvenate wells for people whose water production is in trouble. It keeps new wells from having to be drilled and removes the need to search for new sources of water on a property.