Aiding some ex-offenders troubles one delegate

Aiding some ex-offenders troubles one delegate

By Rebecca Lessner


“Power to the criminal,” said the legislator standing on the House floor, shaking his fist in the air.  “This is the year of the criminal, apparently.”

It is not unusual for Del. Patrick McDonough, the populist conservative from Middle River, to be the lone rabble rouser on legislation.

But Thursday morning’s display of confusion and upset stemmed from his belief that more and more bills this year are rewarding criminals with earlier releases or softer penalties.

The bill that provoked this display of emotion Thursday morning was HB 388, which proposes the creation of a Justice Reinvestment Coordinating Council (JRCC).

Despite resistance, two bills opposed vocally by McDonough Thursday received a majority vote on the House floor and will move onto the Senate.

The Justice Reinvestment Coordinating Council passed 119 to 19, and a pilot program to help ex-offenders start a small business passed 97 to 41.

The council would be placed in the Governor’s Office of Crime Control and Prevention, tasked with developing a statewide policy to save money by reducing recidivism and increasing public safety.

“When you look at this bill it looks very tame and it looks like something we might want to consider… but you need to look at the bigger picture,” said McDonough.

The delegate said the bill had the “false premise” of saving money, but what it really intended to do was create an “advocacy group for early release” of criminals.

Governor supports justice task force

Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican, spoke out in support of the HB 388 Thursday evening.

“Taking a tough stance on crime isn’t just about incarceration,” said Hogan. “In order to achieve lasting results in our criminal justice system, we must strike a balance and explore better, smarter options that reduce recidivism and help those who have served their time get back on their feet.”

McDonough worries that with a focus on reducing the number of criminals returning to jail, the state will be more lax on offenders in an effort to save money.

Del. Kathleen Dumais, sponsor and vice-chair of the Judiciary Committee, argued that the council would not affect reincarceration of criminals, but was a task force to simply look at “what is driving up the cost” of corrections.

“Within the state of Maryland, the number of incarcerated inmates has decreased from 23,900  in 2003, to 21,000 in 2013,” Dumais said.

The cost of corrections in Maryland has risen dramatically in the last 10 years, said Dumais.

McDonough was not convinced, nor was he ready to advocate for a council that studied offenders more than victims.

McDonough proposed two types of criminal, the “saveables” versus the “predators.” He would prefer bills make a distinction between the level of criminal an ex-offender is, before they receive assistance from the state.

“Saveables; These are first, second time offenders, these are young people who want to do their time in prison get out and go home,” said McDonough.

Drug dealers, child abusers and rapists fall into the category “predators,” according to McDonough.

Proposal would help ex-offenders start businesses

McDonough had similar concerns with another bill on the House floor Thursday morning.

HB 909, which would create a pilot program to aid ex-offenders in the development of a small business.

The program would operate off of private funds raised by the Meridian Management Group, who have been working with the Economic Matters Committee throughout the creation of the bill.

Del. Dereck Davis, Economic Matters Committee chairman, says the corporation has found private investors who are interested in contributing $95,000 to the program. As the bill stands now, however, there is no provision to protect the state from contributing funds to cover additional costs.

McDonough does not want taxpayers potentially assisting “predators.”

“They already have jobs, it’s called the drug industry,” said McDonough. “If they’re saveables, I’m with you 100%…but this is so general and broad.”

However, Davis argued after having served their sentence and completed parole, they will need assistance to transition safely back into society.

“If we’re releasing them back into society with no opportunity of employment…What do you think is going to happen if that’s the case?” asked Davis.

McDonough likes the idea of assisting some offenders, just not the predators.

“In the minds eye of people who are supporting this stuff, they’re all the same. Rapists, crimes against children, first or second time offender, they all need a job,” said McDonough. “Well my friends, their victims are not the same and that’s the difference.”

However, legislators like Davis and Dumais believe differentiating between levels of criminal in one bill would not be plausible.

“I do wish life was as simple as my colleague makes it, if things were as black and white…then we wouldn’t have to spend ninety days here, but it is not,” said Dumais.



  1. Buypass

    Pat’s right as usual.

  2. JGwen

    I would suggest these two bills aren’t fully representative of the panoply of bills initiated this session to use taxpayer moneys to further idealists beliefs in the perfectibility of the world and all beings, including those who scoff at the rules of law and demonstrate they feel they do not laws apply to them – drug dealers, child abusers, rapists and their ilk – predators, As pointed out by the Delegate – there may be some justification to assist ““saveables” – first, second time offenders, young people who want to do their time in prison get out and go home,” Here I would still question how many have the background and skills to effectively run a business. Might they be better served by skilled job placement counselors (Should Maryland become a State where businesses with available jobs become a realistic endeavor). As a taxpayer, who hasn’t received a cost of living increase and whose work opportunities have been heavily reduced by a clientele no longer able to afford discretionary services – Delegate McDonough’s perspectives are definitely meritorious!

    • JGwen

      Note: Line 4 should read ”

      and demonstrate they feel the laws do not apply to them – drug dealers, child

Support Our Work!

We depend on your support. A generous gift in any amount helps us continue to bring you this service.