Md. legislators get high marks from consumer group — but not GOP

Md. legislators get high marks from consumer group — but not GOP

By Meg Tully

A consumer advocacy group is giving state lawmakers high scores for passing laws in the 2014 General Assembly session that raise the minimum wage and reduce the impact of foreclosures.

The Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition, a nonprofit whose mission includes advancing fairness and justice for consumers, also released four-year scores that depicted state lawmakers as generally favorable to consumer issues. Only nine of 47 senators and 46 of 141 delegates got four-year scores lower than 80%.

In 2014, the coalition scored 33 senators and 50 delegates with scores of 90% or better, compared to only two senators and 35 delegates who scored under 65%. The scores were based on seven bills, six of which passed.

Senate President Mike Miller and House President Mike Busch both scored well, with 2014 scores of 100% and four-year scores of 97%. Republicans House Minority Leader Del. Nic Kipke and Senate Minority Leader David Brinkley scored lower, with scores of 62% and 75% 2014 and 83% and 69% for four-year scores, respectively. All of the failing grades were Republicans, except for five Democratic delegates, including House Judiciary Chairman Joe Vallario.

“As so many Marylanders struggle to recover from economic hard times, those lawmakers really stood up for Maryland’s working families, and we’re proud to celebrate their work,” stated coalition Executive Director Marceline White in a press release.

Fifth year rankings highlight minimum wage

This is the fifth year the coalition has completed rankings, and this year it highlighted a bill championed by Democratic Gov. Martin O’Malley that raised the minimum wage to $10.10 by 2018 and two bills that will help families who have gone through a foreclosure. Those foreclosure bills cut the amount of time banks can collect mortgage-related debts and that mortgage-related forgiven debts will be exempt from the income tax.

Maryland Business for Responsive Government also included the minimum wage bill as part of its ratings unveiled in May, but the nonprofit advocating for economic development and job creation was on the opposite side of the issue – penalizing lawmakers who had voted for it. Other than that bill, though, the consumer group and business group chose different bills on which to rate lawmakers. The business group ratings were consistently lower, with only one lawmaker scoring 100% and several scoring 0%.

The Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition ratings also included measures to study reducing car insurance costs, ban “ticket bots” that buy up tickets to events before people can, establishing a Consumer Protection Division of the Maryland Attorney General’s Office in Prince George’s County, and a proposed ban on retailers using tracking technology on customer’s phones to track shopping behavior unless notice is posted. That ban was the only legislation scored that did not pass.

‘Consumer Heroes’

Seven “Consumer Heroes” were recognized in the ratings for earning perfect marks between 2011 and 2014. Those included: Sens. Richard Madaleno, Paul Pinsky, and Jim Rosapepe along with Dels. Al Carr, Bill Frick, Barbara Frush, and Carolyn Howard.

Madaleno, D-Montgomery, and Pinsky, D-Prince George’s, both fought on the Senate floor for the minimum wage bill to be expanded, Madaleno by increasing the wage earlier and Pinsky by suggesting an increase for the wage for tipped workers. Neither was successful.

Though the coalition scorecard was overwhelmingly glowing in its review of the legislature, White said there was more work to be done to increase protections from unfair debt collection and ensure paid sick leave for all workers.

About The Author

Meg Tully

Contributing Editor Meg Tully has been covering Maryland politics for more than five years. She has worked for The Frederick News-Post, where she reported during the General Assembly session in Annapolis. She has also worked for The (Hanover) Evening Sun and interned at Baltimore Magazine. Meg has won awards from the Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Press Association for her state and county writing, and a Keystone Press Award for feature writing from the Pennsylvania Newspaper Association. She is a graduate of Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. If you have additional questions or comments contact Meg at:


  1. mikegorman

    Let’s consider the Minimum Wage increase for a moment. Check out Royal Farms or WAWA and count the quantity of persons taking orders for their Fast Food. Count = 0. Now, do the same for McD’s, Burger King, or Wendy’s. Count is often 3 to 5.

    Assume the hourly wage for Order Takers is $7.50. Hourly Cost at the Fast Food places is about $21.50 to $37.50. At Royal Farms or WAWA it’s $0.0.

    Now raise minimum wage to $10 per hour. That increases the Fast Food hourly order cost to $30 to $50.

    Both need to be increased for benefits, meager as they probably are.

    Translated to Hamburgers, at $1.50 for a Cheese Burger, the Hourly cost is from 14 Cheese Burgers to 25 Cheese Burgers. If the minimum wage is raised to $10, the order taker cost in Cheese Burgers is from 15 to 33.

    If the Fast Food folks don’t raise their prices, then where does the extra money come from? How about reconfiguring the order taking process to eliminate Order Takers?

    So, where’s the net benefit to raising the minumum wage? In that regard, the Consumer is protected but the cost is increased unemployment. Improvement? I think not.

    • Sam

      While there is definitely merit to the thought that some prices will increase as wages increase, your analogy isn’t very good. It assumes that the only expense that the fast food place has is labor cost, which isn’t true. Once you account for the cost of the food itself, the cost of maintenance, rent, etc, then the amount that prices would need to be increased isn’t as high as you’re saying.

Support Our Work!

We depend on your support. A generous gift in any amount helps us continue to bring you this service.