Blowback on Rascovar column was fierce; Bongino calls for boycott of Maryland Reporter

Blowback on Rascovar column was fierce; Bongino calls for boycott of Maryland Reporter

By Len Lazarick

The blowback from Barry Rascovar’s column accusing Republicans of being anti-immigrant was fast and furious Monday and congressional candidate Dan Bongino urged a boycott of unless the column was taken down.

At the urging of Bongino and others, about a dozen people asked to have the column removed, as well as demanding a retraction and an apology.

That’s not going to happen unless Rascovar chooses to apologize for what was unusually strong language for a long-time columnist who’s been known to skewer Democrats and Republicans alike.

Taking the column down is not really an option, since it has already been republished on several websites that use all our content, such as CityBizList, Baltimore Post Examiner and the Investigative News Network. The Sun’s blog roundup had also linked to it as well. Two people who vehemently objected to the column also posted it in full on Facebook and email.

Bongino declined an offer to respond to the column with his own article.

Bongino ‘profoundly disappointed’

Dan Bongino

Dan Bongino

Here’s what Bongino, a Republican running in the 6th congressional district, wrote to me in an email at 9:38 a.m. Little did I know that he was already calling for a boycott of the site on Twitter.

“I’m profoundly disappointed that you permitted Barry Rascovar’s hate-filled, ignorant, one-sided piece to run today,” Bongino wrote. “This piece is so full of vitriol and emotion, rather than reason, that it discredits your entire operation.”

“Either Rascovar is completely ignorant of the layered and complicated problems brought about by chaotic immigration at the border or, he is purposefully being deceptive.

“In conclusion, I’ve always thought the spin on your site was kept to a minimum but, after today, that has fallen apart. I cannot in good faith speak well of it or interview with any member of it as long as this piece stands.”

Still unaware that he was asking people to boycott the site, here’s how I responded to Bongino, with whom I’ve had a generally cordial relationship since he ran for U.S. Senate in 2012.

Column won’t be removed

“Here’s the deal that I have with Barry,” I told Bongino. “He writes a column for Monday, and I publish it first, clearly labeled as his opinion.

“I happened to disagree with the partisan motives he ascribes in this column, and I knew it would be controversial.

“But I’m not about to dump a columnist with 40+ years experience in Maryland politics, and I’m certainly not going to take down his piece.

“ is a place where both Barry Rascovar and Dan Bongino get to have their say, John Delaney and Roy Meyers (counter Delaney commentary Friday), pro-marijuana, anti-marijuana, etc.

“Barry’s column has already generated seven negative comments that appear immediately following the article. I suspect there will be more. I would be happy to publish a response from you of similar length.

“Threatening not to talk to because of a column that doesn’t even mention you doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Why don’t you funnel your anger into a constructive dialogue that gives your side of the story?”

‘Hate-piece, pure and simple’

To which Bongino responded:

“Sorry Len but this piece is a hate-piece, pure-and-simple and should have never been published. There is already a movement growing, among a large group of grassroots activists, to respond.

“As for writing a response, and the piece not being directed at me, I couldn’t disagree more. The piece is broadly directed at Republicans, of which I am one, and why should I, or any other Republican respond to an ignorant, “when did you stop beating your wife”, hate-piece?”

A protest call

I also got a call from Ann Miller, a Republican Tea Party activist in Baltimore County widely known for her opposition to Common Core. In a Facebook posting she urged her 2,600 friends to call me on my cell phone as well. No one else did.

Other writers, clearly upset with the column, did recognize that it was Rascovar’s opinion and that he was a weekly contributor. It is somewhat ironic that the last strong protest I got to one of his columns was three weeks ago from Gov. Martin O’Malley’s office, whom Rascovar defended this week in the immigration column.

Republicans mischaracterized, says former MoCo GOP chair

One of the most substantive and informative responses to Rascovar came from Mark Uncapher, former chair of the Montgomery County Republican Party.

“Usually your columns are very insightful,” said Uncapher. “Not today. I suppose everyone deserves a vacation once in a while.”

“First and foremost, you conflate legal and illegal immigration.  They are distinctly different issues. While opposition to illegal immigration is high within the Republican Party, there is also substantial support for increasing skills based immigration. It is a huge mistake not to distinguish between the two.

“Second,  since when is appropriate to use graffiti to characterize a political party’s position?  Would you go to Baltimore and attribute all political graffiti there to Democrats?

“Third, you mischaracterize the historic position of the Republican Party on immigration. It is true that “Know Nothings” made up part of the coalition that formed the party.  However other Republicans, primarily led by Gov. William Seward took a more pro-immigration view, and carried the day for the 1860 Platform.  (See section 14  –

Ronald Reagan on immigration

“Finally, is there a more eloquent articulation of  pro-immigration position than in Ronald Reagan’s Farewell Address?  (And he did after all sign into law the 1986 Act, which while increasing immigration was at least intended to stop illegal immigration by preventing the employment of illegals.)  Reagan said:

“I’ve spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don’t know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That’s how I saw it, and see it still. ”

Lesson for Len

I suppose the lesson I learned is that in today’s partisan political environment, discussion of immigration is not just controversial, but potentially explosive, especially when inflammatory language gets tossed around.

It will be hard to tell how effective the boycott of will be, especially in midsummer. I do know that at least half of the dozen or so people who wrote me an email are not among the 5,600 subscribers to the daily email blast.

Rascovar’s columns are often some of the most read articles we publish on But less than 100 people clicked on his column in Monday’s newsletter. Those numbers will probably be better today.

If you would like to subscribe to the 8:30 a.m. daily newsletter — which links to all the new content to the site —you can sign up here and on the home page of website.

***GIVE US A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME: To help improve our coverage and provide foundations and advertisers with more information about our readers, will you kindly take a few minutes tofill out our subscriber survey? It is just 12 simple questions and will take less than 5 minutes of your time. We would appreciate it very much. Thank you in advance for helping us.***


About The Author

Len Lazarick

Len Lazarick was the founding editor and publisher of and is currently the president of its nonprofit corporation and chairman of its board He was formerly the State House bureau chief of the daily Baltimore Examiner from its start in April 2006 to its demise in February 2009. He was a copy editor on the national desk of the Washington Post for eight years before that, and has spent decades covering Maryland politics and government.


  1. Daniel Menefee

    Good response, Len, although you don’t owe anyone the slightest explanation. Putting a regular contributor’s copy through a constant litmus test is not a good path to take. Conservatives and liberals hate being criticized within their ranks. There are 474,000 eligible hispanic voters in Maryland of which 42 percent are naturalized citizens. So I’m not surprised that rank-and-file Republicans are protesting so harshly in an election year.

  2. Dale McNamee

    Censoring Barry Rascovar or boycotting the Maryland Reporter isn’t necessary or really useful…

    Ovwerwhelming, well reasoned,furious responses addressing the issue free of personal attacks has a far better result with writers like Len Lazarack & Barry Rascovar…

    I, for one, won’t boycott… It’s the only site that sheds light on what Md.State and County governments are doing…

    The Baltimore Sun & Washington Post don’t !

  3. Yogi

    “Taking the column down is not really an option, since it has already been republished on several websites . . . .” That’s your reason, Len? How about: “Taking the column down is not an option, period.” ?

  4. DCRussell

    I started a comment, posted both on this site and Rascovar’s site with “I’m surprised that Rascovar would publish this kind of crappy B.S. It is certainly out of character.”

    I don’t think Rascovar should be censored in any way, shape, or form. He is entitled to his position. I appreciate Len Lazarick’s post of Rascovar’s column, whatever it says. He and his service should not be judged on the basis of one unpopular piece by one regular columnist.

    If the column reduces Rascovar’s readership or influence, or lowers public opinion of his value, so be it–he’s entitled to say what he thinks and we are entitled to draw whatever conclusions we wish about him. My personal opinion of him has taken a major hit.

  5. James Simpson

    Editors are free to pick and choose what to publish. But what they do publish is reflective of what they view as acceptable public discourse, whether they agree or disagree with it. When someone chooses to publish a post like Rascovar’s, it reflects seriously bad judgement, not because of Rascovar’s views on illegal aliens, but because of his blatantly fraudulent hit piece. It has been the never ending political strategy to cast anyone who disagrees with the Left’s radical, destructive plans as “racist,” “sexist,” “homophobe,” “xenophobe,” etc. This has been the Left’s mantra since Lenin and Co began their offensive against the West one hundred years ago.

    Anyone who allows this message to go forward is in essence promoting radical leftist propaganda, which is designed specifically to demonize anyone who disagrees with them, and polarize society. The facts of this controversy are not in the same universe. Conservatives believe in the rule-of-law because, guess what, that is what RUNS OUR NATION! It is what has given America freedom and prosperity unmatched in the history of the world. Without the rule-of-law we have anarchy, and that is exactly what the Left is demanding! They are deliberately setting out to wreck our country. A few of them are even willing to acknowledge that (try Bill Ayers for example). They do not have a shred of legitimacy in their argument, and calling names as Rascovar does – it is ALL he does – is intellectually unprincipled, lazy and dishonest.

    Obama and Co. have illegally encouraged this mass migration for the conspicuously self-serving purpose of packing the rolls with future Democratic voters, while creating chaos in our nation and hoping to lay it all at the GOPs feet for the 2014 elections. It was a desperation move borne of the recognition that Democrats are going to lose big time in November given Obama’s endless scandals and disastrous policies. This is a distraction, an unsrupulous deception move, and unworthy of a sitting President. Children are being raped, beaten, robbed, kidnapped and murdered because this president sent Central America a message: “I will take care of you.” That is what these illegal kids are telling the Border Patrol. All so the Democrats can cobb together some more votes! It is a national disgrace.

    A publication that allows such utter tripe as Rascovar’s screed spreads misinformation and hatred, polarizing and discrediting the only people standing up against this monstrous tactic. Meanwhile it legitimizes what is nothing more than a base political tactic that has defined the Left since Saul Alinsky first codified it in his 1971 pamphlet “Rules for Radicals.”

    P.S. I sent Len Lazarick an email expressing my disdain for this article and I am a subscriber to his email blasts.

  6. MD observer

    Each of the two parties’ arguments deserves a good lambasting. However, I disagree with Rascovar’s “means” used to get to the “ends” of his opinion piece.

    The Senate “bipartisan” bill is absurd….$158 billion per CBO scoring as amended in June’s revision. That’s a lot of money, even after taking into account the beneficial effects on the economy and associated tax-collection offsets.

    I suggest Rascovar consider the fact that Democrats are exploiting both Republicans and taxpayers (think bloat) by sending this absurd Senate bill over to the House.

  7. abby_adams

    While I like Dan, I can’t agree with his objections. Rascovar’s rant was incendiary to say the least! Labeling the GOP as the cause of so much hate speech around this issue dismisses the opinion of many moderate Democrats in this state & around the country. Thanks for publishing his opinion since I know it surprised many & angered quite a few.

  8. Tanzi

    Rascovar’s two-minute hate at GOP got some publicity and Republicans’ attention.

  9. KAS

    I don’t think Dan Bongino is really clear on what “hate speech” is.

    Maryland Reporter is doing the right thing in standing behind its journalist and offering to provide a forum for a response. That’s how things should work in an open society.