Photo above: Budget analysts brief the House Appropriations Committee Thursday.
By Rebecca Lessner
Gov. Larry Hogan was chastised by delegates for attempting to slip into the budget a grant program for corporations who make private school scholarship donations, essentially bypassing the normal process.
“He’s circumventing the policymakers,” said Speaker of the House Michael Busch, a Democrat.
Hogan’s supplemental budget announced Thursday morning includes a provision for a “Student Assistance Organization Business Entity Grant.”
The grant is similar to Hogan’s own HB 487, which has been stuck in the Ways and Means committee since early February.
“He attempts to make a very complicated 10-page bill into a five sentence provision in the supplemental budget. To me, it’s policymaking through the budget, which we try to avoid,” said Del. Brooke Lierman, D-Baltimore City, after the House Appropriations committee received a briefing.
Hogan’s original bill, the Maryland Education Credit, created a state income tax credit of 60% for businesses donating to nonprofit organizations that aided student scholarship funds for public or private schools.
In the budget, it has several major changes: it is now a grant instead of a tax credit, is funded through the cigarette restitution fund instead of the general fund, and excludes public schools.
Committee is still considering similar bill
“We heard the bill and we are considering it,” said Del. Mary Washington, D-Baltimore City, a member of the House Ways and Means committee. “We are having conversations with people, but the governor chose to just put it in the budget bill.”
Washington is concerned over the way the proposal has evolved to exclude public schools.
The Maryland State Education Association (MSEA) also feels the switch to offering scholarship funding to only private schools is unfair.
“His bill left open the idea that this fund would be used for public schools, but this supplemental budget slams that door,” said Sean Johnson, assistant director of public affairs at MSEA.
Johnson stated that there is a “notion” these scholarships go towards helping Title One kids who cannot afford to attend private schools, where the funds are actually “enriching families that can already afford private schooling.”
Hogan’s proposal requires that the organizations offer priority assistance to students that qualify for federal free or reduced meals, a low-income program.
Grants for contributions to private school scholarships
Another change in the language of the bill is instead of receiving up to a 60% tax-credit, donating corporations will receive a grant of up to 50% of their contribution.
Businesses that make donations to schools are already eligible for a tax deduction at the end of the year. Lierman believes corporations will be getting “two bites of the apple” if the supplemental budget passes.
Delegates, along with MSEA, are also concerned about the Department of Business and Economic Development (DBED) administering the program.
“Why DBED, if this ultimately is a scholarship program?” asked Appropriations Chair Maggie McIntosh, D-Baltimore City.
DBED usually handles tax credits and Washington questioned why the budget contains no guidelines to require the “most knowledgeable” authority on scholarships to administer the program.
“There’s no oversight of these newly created student assistant organizations,” said Washington.
The budget proposal would involve the Maryland State Department of Education by funneling the donations through its Non-Public Schools Program for Textbooks and Computer Hardware and Software, but DBED will be primarily responsible for the grants.
Fund doesn’t have enough for proposed program spending
With the switch of the $5 million in funding to the cigarette restitution fund, the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) raised concerns that spending cuts would need to be made elsewhere. CORRECTED 4/3/2015, 8:30 a.m.The fund, from the long-ago settlement with the cigarette makers, only contains $500,000.
However, based off of the original bill, business proponents see the grant as an incentive for more big-business investment in Maryland.
During his testimony at the HB 487 hearing, Carville Collins, a lawyer with DLA Piper who represents “corporations in Maryland or corporations considering relocating to Maryland,” stated that his clients are already investing in schools and the governor’s program would incentivize more investment.
Collins worries that our neighbors are ahead of the curve when it comes to school investing, effectively “isolating Maryland” from surrounding states.
“They see that our economic competitors in Virginia and Pennsylvania have mature, effective programs,” said Collins.
Johnson of MSEA disagreed, stating that programs in other states “lack complete oversight.”
According to Johnson, Pennsylvania’s similar program started out with $10 to $12 million dedicated to grant programs and has now grown to $80 million, being staffed by two employees.
Hogan open to compromise
Hogan stated in a press release Thursday that he is open to working with the conference committee, which is made up of legislators from both the House and Senate who are currently working on the original budget.
Appropriation will work on the supplemental budget and recommendations, then it will be up to the conference committee to amend those recommendations into the final budget.
“We still have much more to do, but as we draw closer to the end of the legislative session, I look forward to working with the conference committee to reach a final budget that addresses the concerns of all hardworking Marylanders,” said Hogan.
Gov. Hogan’s determination to force us to subsidize mainly religious non-public schools is outrageous. He can see that the legislation that he sponsored to accomplish this unworthy goal (HB487) isn’t all that popular in committee and so he thought he’d try to sneak it through in a supplemental appropriations bill. There’s nothing here to compromise about, governor. It’s a totally bad idea to require a public subsidy via whatever process for the benefit of schools that are protected by the First Amendment in their right to discriminate in the selection of students and staff and to indoctrinate children in the religion of their choice. Religious schools cannot, because of that First Amendment protection be prohibitedfrom teaching, for example, that women should have a subordinate role
in society, that they should have no choice with regard to their reproductive rights, that same-sex relationships are sinful, that the color of one’s skin makes one superior to another, and that their particular religion is the only one that matters. The First Amendment is not just a one-way street. It not only protects religious entities in their right to do their thing, but it also protects the public from having to support whatever it is that these religious entities choose to do.
There has been too much governmental aid to religion already. Let us not permit more of it. If Gov. Hogan does not know better than what he has shown so far, he should resign. In the meantime, our legislators should not surrender to his schemes.