Transportation commission officially recommends tax and fee hikes, feasibility study for mass transit authority

By Megan Poinski

gas pump

Photo by Brian Herzog.

The Blue Ribbon Commission on Maryland Transportation Funding is recommending that the General Assembly increase wholesale gas taxes by 15 cents, prevent money from the transportation trust fund from being siphoned off to other projects, and do a feasibility study on establishing a regional transit authority.

The 28-member commission reached the recommendations by consensus at its final meeting Tuesday.  They were essentially the same as what they had agreed to at meetings earlier this month, and are meant to raise about $870 million in new funds for transportation.

The commission’s report to Gov. Martin O’Malley and the General Assembly will give specific recommendations to raise sustainable transportation funding and continue to finance county and municipal transportation projects.

Chairman Gus Bauman said that he believed the report and its recommendations are “strongly composed,” and will force a conversation about transportation funds.

“It has to be something real and specific, and not a bowl of mush, so they have to react to it,” Bauman said about the report. “…If we can force a reaction, we have achieved half our goal.”

Funding recommendations

The commission proposed:

  • A total 15-cent gas tax increase, phased in over three years. At the end of the phase-in, the increase would bring in $491 million annually.
  • A 50% increase in vehicle registration fees, which would raise $165 million a year.
  • Increasing the titling tax rate from 6% to 6.5%. This would bring in $69 million a year.
  • Doubling the fee for emissions testing from $14 to $28. This would raise $22 million a year.
  • Increasing miscellaneous MVA fees, which would bring in $34 million annually.
  • Increasing MTA fares and ending funding of free rides out of the transportation trust fund. This would earn $25 million a year.
  • Indexing gas tax increases to inflation after three years, so the new funds keep pace with the economy.

Bauman said that the recommendations were crafted in order to hit everyone using transportation. While no votes were taken, Bauman said he knew some members of the commission were not happy with all of the recommendations – and that was OK.

“Our plan is to make everyone a little upset, not to make one or two people extremely upset,” he said. “That’s the goal here: something that can be swallowed.”

Del. Tawanna Gaines, who chairs the House of Delegates subcommittee on transportation spending, said it is important that people know that the recommended gas tax increase is on the wholesale price, not what people pay at the pump. Because gas prices fluctuate based on several conditions, she said it is unlikely that customers would actually see pump prices rise by 15 cents.

Lon Anderson of AAA Mid-Atlantic, who sees pump prices influenced by different levels of gas taxes in Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia, said he thinks the gas tax would be passed through to consumers.

Mass transit authority study

The only new policy recommendation put in the report at Tuesday’s meeting advises that a study be done to determine the feasibility of a mass transit authority. This authority could have the power to levy taxes and undertake other initiatives to fund mass transit.

Anderson pointed out that most of the revenue suggestions from the commission have a disproportionate impact on motorists. There are already mass transit systems needing more money in Baltimore and the Washington, D.C. suburbs, he said. Meanwhile, two new transit projects that recently got federal approval will most likely need millions of dollars in new state funding to go forward.

“There is not enough money in motorists’ pockets to pay for the mass transit system that we want,” Anderson said.

Greater Baltimore Committee President and CEO Donald Fry suggested that a study be done to look at forming a mass transit authority to work on this.

Alvin Nichols, who is also a member of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board, said that WMATA is also considering a regional authority. Nichols said it would be a good time for Maryland to consider it as well.

Trust in the trust fund

Bauman and other commission members have long said that the keystone to the recommendations is ensuring that money earmarked for transportation is actually used there. Money in the state’s transportation trust fund is often taken for other uses. Bauman said he believes Marylanders are capable of accepting tax and fee increases.

“The quid pro quo is all of the money will come back and be used on transportation in Maryland,” he said.

Legislative attempts to protect the transportation trust fund have been unsuccessful. During this year’s legislative session, Sen. Robert Garagiola proposed legislation for a constitutional amendment to protect transportation trust dollars. It died in committee. A new budget requirement did pass that all funds taken from transportation must be repaid in five years.

Gaines said that she can see the General Assembly taking many of the commission’s recommendations seriously, but that the transportation trust fund protection will be a “pretty sticky” issue.

About The Author

Len Lazarick

Len Lazarick was the founding editor and publisher of and is currently the president of its nonprofit corporation and chairman of its board He was formerly the State House bureau chief of the daily Baltimore Examiner from its start in April 2006 to its demise in February 2009. He was a copy editor on the national desk of the Washington Post for eight years before that, and has spent decades covering Maryland politics and government.


  1. Skip727

    Who is on this “blue ribbon” committee? And if they already agreed at an earlier meeting on this cash grab, WHY did they have to meet again? Talk about waste. People who enjoy meetings should not be in charge of anything.

  2. Whcampbell

    Why does Maryland need so much money from its financially strapped residents?  Because a) they will divert even more money from the Transportation Trust Fund, b) they will buy union votes and contributions by increasing questionable public works projects, c) they will increase State workers’ pay and enefits to buy their votes, or d) all of the above.  Ths is the kind of abuse that one party rule delivers!

  3. Paul Thomas

    This is all bullshit.  A 15 cent per gallon increase on the wholesale market means it will be 20 cent to the consumer.  50% increase in MVA Fees –  Are you Crazy !  What is this 28 member panel thinking about.  Vote against this measure . 

  4. Anonymous

    Unless every MD resident, from Oakland to Ocean City starts badgering their state legislators, this money grab will pass. A 60% increase in the gas tax? More subsidies for Mass Transit? A 100% increase in emissions testing? I don’t know what this panel was smoking, but their conclusion that MD residents are eager to give more $$ to Annapolis is way off base. We are struggling to keep our heads above water now after a 20% sales tax increase that was supposed to solve our fiscal problems. Add in the 9% alcohol &100%  flush tax, along with higher tolls & DMV fees, how do we starve this tax beast? Where is the accountability?

  5. Jim Pelura

    With the exception of the part about keeping the money in the trust fund, it will all pass with ease.  I hope that sooner or later Maryland voters will wake up and see what the General Assembly is doing to them.

  6. Bill Bissenas

    “Marxists adore shock and awe so when a power grab is in the offing they act recklessly and decisively, not intimidated by risk nor distracted by criticism, nor do they care about contrary opinion or timidly ask permission. They prepare in the way of septicemia, systemically, periphery and core simultaneously, their underlying delusions nourished and emboldened by furtive conquest. It’s a classic sociopathic craving. Even when they lose they give ground grudgingly, and then only with ferocious and unending rear guard skirmishes and, often as not, they retake lost ground by stealth or by expending disproportional resources the opposition isn’t willing to match.

    Progressivism is a performance art; soliloquies and street theatre, persuasion and bullying. But mere appearance is insufficient for actual governance and so they’re perpetually opening new productions, the audience can’t be allowed to leave the theatre or have a moment’s reflection. It’s the lack of results which brings them low, the specter of promises broken and conspicuous ineptitude and the grey tedium of blame shifting. The disconnected detritus of the New Deal disfiguring DC like a down-at-the-heels midway are the remnants of past performances, bloated and largely criminal busywork mills to distract and boogeyman the peasantry, vandalizing everything within reach as we stagger towards total collapse, determined that we be buried by them or with them.”

    – Ol’ Remus

Support Our Work!

We depend on your support. A generous gift in any amount helps us continue to bring you this service.