Rascovar Commentary: Md. deficit — Half a billion and counting

By Barry Rascovar

For MarylandReporter.com

Budget Highlights 2014When legislators finished the 2013 General Assembly session in April, they patted themselves on the back for putting the state on a glide path to wipe out Maryland’s long-running structural deficit in the next budget. Think again.

That deep, dark fiscal hole has returned big-time.

This month’s fiscal prediction by the Department of Legislative Services projects a structural imbalance by next June 30 of over half a billion dollars with nearly as much red ink the following year. It’s a stunning reversal.

More Bad News Coming

Even worse, that projection was made before carnage from the Republican-instigated federal government shutdown could be fully factored into the equation.

It’s now almost certain December’s revenue update will show a dip in holiday spending (and tax collections) as Marylanders cut back on purchases due to worries about a second federal closure and a weak recovery.

Bar graph shows spending growth from fiscal 2007 to 2013.

Bar graph shows spending growth from fiscal 2007 to 2013.

Economic uncertainty and the prospects of another train wreck in Washington will keep businesses from hiring or expanding. Federal contractors are especially vulnerable and will continue to lay off workers and hunker down.

Maryland is so heavily dependent on federal employment that another prolonged political stand-off could send the state budget into free-fall.

While much of Maryland’s dilemma is due to lingering effects from the Great Recession and a dysfunctional Congress, the main culprits are Gov. Martin O’Malley and Democratic leaders in the legislature.

Spending vs. revenue out of balance

Time and again they have resisted unpopular but necessary steps to rein in social spending. O’Malley, in particular, was determined this year to ramp up aid to colleges ($157 million more), K-12 schooling ($187 million), health care ($138 million) and Medicaid ($243 million) in spite of continuing weaknesses in Maryland’s economy.

Graph of debt capacity

Maryland general obligation bond debt cannot exceed 4% of personal income, the maximum debt capacity.

Why hasn’t Maryland’s structural deficit disappeared?

To quote the state’s fiscal gurus from last April, it’s simple: “ongoing spending exceeds ongoing revenue by $172 million.”

That $172 million gap between what Annapolis spends and takes in now is expected to balloon to a $307 million gap next year – and that’s not accounting for more bad news before the budget is released on the third Wednesday in January.

One of the key drivers is eminently fixable – but not by this governor and not in an election year. Debt service on Maryland’s general obligation bonds is soaring. This requires some explanation.

 Debt service is rising

Up until 2013, the state’s modest property tax (11.2 cents per $100 of a property’s assessed value) raised enough money to cover debt service payments to bondholders.

But because the state keeps issuing more bonds each year, the amount needed to cover interest and principal is rising 6% annually – despite ultra-low interest rates.

Unfortunately, property tax revenue is flat. Thus it no longer covers rising debt expense – it will fall $300 million short of the goal next year.

Debt service -- the interest and principal which must be paid every year -- is not allowed to exceed 8% of the state general fund revenues.

Debt service — the interest and principal which must be paid every year — is not allowed to exceed 8% of the state general fund revenues.

Why? Because the Great Recession sent housing prices plummeting. Today, Maryland’s taxable property base is $43 billion lower than at its peak.

No rebound is expected anytime soon, either, because of Maryland’s phased-in and capped system of re-assessing property values.

Thus, O’Malley will have to find $259 million in his January general fund budget just to cover debt service. That puts a huge crimp in his plans to make his final social spending plan especially generous.

A partial solution

There’s an easy way to remedy the situation: Raise the state property tax rate a penny or two. That would restore the rate to its 2006 level.

Such a move would cut in half Maryland’s general fund structural shortfall next year and restore the original intent of the state property tax – to pay all bond expenses.

Unless O’Malley acts, the situation will grow considerably worse. By 2017, the next governor will be diverting $531 million in state general funds just to pay the state’s bond debt.

But no action is likely

O’Malley isn’t worried, though, about the next governor’s fiscal dilemma. He’s trying to burnish his reputation as he runs for national office. The last thing he wants in his final year is another rise in taxes.

So the property tax collection shortfall will continue – even though a small hike would barely be felt by homeowners ($30 or $60 on a $300,000 home). It’s another example of elected officials failing to confront festering problems and instead taking the easy and politically comfortable way out.

No wonder American democracy is in such a mess. No one in authority wants to make the tough decision and fix what’s broken.



About The Author

Len Lazarick


Len Lazarick was the founding editor and publisher of MarylandReporter.com and is currently the president of its nonprofit corporation and chairman of its board He was formerly the State House bureau chief of the daily Baltimore Examiner from its start in April 2006 to its demise in February 2009. He was a copy editor on the national desk of the Washington Post for eight years before that, and has spent decades covering Maryland politics and government.


  1. nugont1985

    M56Q Lately i would be really, really low on cash and debts were eating me from everywhere! that was UNTIL I found out how to earn money.. on the INTERNET! I went to surveymoneymaker d.o.t net, and started doing surveys for cash, and surely i’ve been much more able to pay my bills!! I’m so glad, I did this!!! – gqa9

  2. jay

    Cut spending period.
    If you increase taxes on the wealthy more will leave and Maryland will be left with less taxable income.

  3. ksteve

    Before increasing the property tax to combat the deficit, I’d rather see some other things done.
    My suggestions (two about improper spending and three about tax

    (1) Don’t put millions (or anything) in the budget bill for non-public
    school textbooks and computer stuff.

    (2) Don’t keep authorizing bonds for the pet construction or reconstruction
    projects of private or religious entities.

    (3) Close tax loopholes that essentially benefit the wealthy.

    (4) Increase the state income tax rates for the wealthiest persons.

    (5) Don’t decrease the corporate tax rate.

  4. abby_adams

    You mean the rubber stamp approval of every bond request has consequences? My, my how will the Democrats in Annapolis spin that one? Will they tempt fate & ask for a property tax increase?? But I guess according to Barry, if the state property tax rate was increased we would barely feel it & it really wouldn’t make a dent in the upcoming shortfall. Duh! Marylanders who have disagreed with the MOB (Miller, O’Malley & Busch) way of overtaxing & overspending have been castigated. Only the loyal low info voters will buy this stinking pile. I said it before, anyone who can move out of Maryland is making plans. We’ve worked hard for our money & we’re tired of handing it over to Washington & Annapolis to waste.

  5. joe

    Here’s an idea:how about Maryland Governor O’Malley and the “tax and spend” Democratic legislature reducing FY 2015 state spending by $500 million to pay for the structural deficit and to not increase any social spending? That way they keep their hands out of Maryland taxpayers pockets for their overspending and mismanagement of the people’s money!

    • abby_adams

      Sorry but it will never happen in this one party state. No Democratic legislator will dare reduce the goodies already granted or postpone any new handouts. They’ll just find another way to raise “revenue”. They haven’t a clue & really don’t care to see anything past the end of their noses. After all, they know they have the upper hand in the ballot box & that’s all that matters.

      • joe

        I agree the Democratic politicians don’t have a clue or intentionally create these situations in order to raise taxes.
        But I also keep hoping that some of the sheeple, who complain about taxes, will see the light and stop voting for the same crowd of tax, spend and over-regulation Democratic politicians every four years.
        Fat chance!!

Support Our Work!

We depend on your support. A generous gift in any amount helps us continue to bring you this service.