Montgomery County Democrats organize opposition against congressional districts

Montgomery County Democrats announce opposition to Question 5.

Montgomery County Democrats announce opposition to Question 5.

By Sam Smith

Phil Andrews by myfriendofhillary on flickr

Phil Andrews by myfriendofhillary on flickr

Montgomery County “good government” Democrats are organizing their opposition against the “atrocious gerrymandering” in the congressional redistricting that is on the ballot for voter approval as Question 5.

Led by County Council members Phil Andrews and Valerie Ervin, more than 20 county, state and municipal officials and community leaders gathered in Rockville Monday to urge voters to vote no on Question 5, saying the map drawn by governor and approved by the legislature interfered with fair representation for constituents in a county now split into three different congressional districts.

The group favors having Maryland’s congressional lines drawn by an independent commission.

“We can see what happens when elected officials draw their own boundaries,”  Andrews said. “Redistricting is fundamental to effective democracy. If we don’t have fair and rational districts, we don’t have competition. Gerrymandering has been used for 200 years to undermine political competition. If we don’t have competition, our democracy doesn’t work well.”

Republicans organized opposition

Republicans organized opposition to the map and led the petition drive to put it on the ballot. They could possibly lose one of their two seats in the House of Representatives if Democrat John Delaney beats Republican Roscoe Bartlett in the newly drawn 6th district. But an African American group joined in their opposition as well, and lost a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn the map.

3rd Congressional District 2012 (Md. Planning Dept. map)

3rd Congressional District 2012 (Md. Planning Dept. map)

With a number of Montgomery and Prince Georges County Democrats speaking out against the map, the opposition has become more bipartisan. The Democratic central committees in both counties did not take a position supporting the new lines, as state party leaders had urged them to do.

Map of 3rd Congressional District makes the case

Andrews said that all it takes to be appalled by the proposal is looking at a map of the 3rd Congressional District, which he said proponents of  the governor’s plan try to keep hidden.  The district is a prime example of what a gerrymandered district looks like.

Maryland’s 3rd is the third least compact district in the country, spanning four counties. The district extends from Silver Spring, Olney,  and Annapolis to Columbia and Towson.

“It really does look like blood spatter from a crime scene rather than a congressional district,” Andrews said. “How can anyone represent this district? How can anyone remember the boundaries of this district without an incredible GPS and without a boat.”

Minority majority not reflected in representation

In 2010, Montgomery County became a majority-minority county for the first time. According to the 2010 U.S Census, 50.7% of the county is other than non-hispanic white.  Due to redistricting, the county loses the possibility of electing a minority member of Congress as it also loses parts of the the 4th Congressional District represented by Rep. Donna Edwards, an African American from Prince George’s County.

The three districts that represent Montgomery County will most likely be represented by three white males, unless little known Republican Eric Knowles upsets Rep. John Sarbanes in the 3rd district.

Valerie Ervin

Valerie Ervin

“By taking district four out of Montgomery County, there is virtually, we believe, no possibility of electing a minority candidate at the congressional level in Montgomery County,” Montgomery County Council member Valerie Ervin said.

Del. Braveboy, D- Prince Georges, and Del. Ana Sol Gutierrez, D-Montgomery, took an early stand against the proposed district map last year in the General Assembly when opposing the map was an unpopular position in the Maryland Democratic party. Dels. Luiz Simmons and Alfred Carr Jr., also Montgomery Democrats, voted against the map too, Andrews said.

Task force proposed to create commission process

Braveboy said she introduced a bill earlier this year creating a task force to design a commission process for the state of Maryland, as is now done in eight states. However, that bill was never voted on. She said she will try and get it passed again in next legislative session beginning in January. She said that a task force is important because it prevents Maryland from jumping into a commission process without understanding the implications.

“We have to start with a task force because we don’t just want to move directly into a commission not understanding how that commission will be formed and what are the implications and I think we want to do best practices,” Braveboy said.

Ervin said that she is confident that Question 5 will be shot down because more Democrats are speaking out against the map and there was an increased awareness as a result of primary election participation where many voters became aware that the districts have changed.

“This is when the real discussion started to happen in Montgomery County. Moving forward, I feel that this will be overturned by the voters,” Ervin said.

About The Author

Len Lazarick

Len Lazarick was the founding editor and publisher of and is currently the president of its nonprofit corporation and chairman of its board He was formerly the State House bureau chief of the daily Baltimore Examiner from its start in April 2006 to its demise in February 2009. He was a copy editor on the national desk of the Washington Post for eight years before that, and has spent decades covering Maryland politics and government.


  1. Parrotisla

    I still don’t understand why the courts don’t seem to think this is gerrymandering. It almost looks like the original Gerrymandered district that went to the supreme court.

  2. DR GRR

    Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. The drawing of districts and the consequent elections should not be an incumbent job protection plan.The current congressional map as drawn now for Maryland is a reprehensible, mess of a map. And it is indeed, one of the worst in our nation. CD 2 and CD3 should both be renamed some sort of adventure tour or maybe a sequel to the Steve Martin movie, let’s call this one “Buses, Trains, Automobiles and Ferry-Boats,” since it may take that and more just to navigate one’s way through those districts. On second thought, instead of Gerrymandering those might best be called “Ferrymandering.” Look, I know this is cheesy “gallows humor,” but regrettable and truly, the joke is on all of Maryland voters. In their absolute, blind, partisan zest to chop the state into pieces to increase their US House representation from 6-2 to 7-1, nothing, and I mean nothing, not communities of interest, diverse neighborhoods, compactness, competition, contiguity or even natural boundaries stood in the way of the majority party. They know better. We know better. And Maryland certainly deserves better. Reject this map, Vote “No,” and send a message-no more politics as usual. Maybe then Annapolis will take note and do something they both can and should do next time around.

    • abby_adams

      I hope that more voters will do some homework on this issue. Slicing & dicing neighborhoods just to bolster control of the House for the Dems does nothing for constituents except further disinfranchise any voter that doesn’t check off the D box.. Gerrymandering by either party is wrong!

  3. William Campbell

    Congressional districts that are compact and keep communties of interest intact is neither a Democratic, nor a Republican issue. It is a good government issue. Maryland is comprised of many disparate groups who deserve representation. The overwhelming Democratic State leadership have disenfranchized huge swaths of residents to keep their cronies in office. Maryland’s population is 40% minority. We should have at least three, and perhaps four districts where minority candidates could be competitive instead of just two. What is “fair” about this map? I urge everyone to vote “No” on Question 5, and throw out the bums who passed this travesty on us in 2014!