By Megan Poinski
Megan@MarylandReporter.com
Although the next legislative session is still a couple months off, it’s becoming apparent that new taxes will be one of the central issues before the General Assembly.
The Blue Ribbon Commission on Maryland Transportation Funding formally recommended a 15-cent per gallon gas tax increase phased in over three years, pushing the state’s total tax to 38.5 cents. After that, they recommended, the tax should be increased annually based on inflation. Proceeds would be used to fund transportation needs.
Additionally, doubling or tripling the “flush tax” – the water and sewer fee collected to fund Chesapeake Bay cleanup – was proposed to the Governor’s Task Force on Sustainable Growth and Wastewater Disposal. The average residential fee is currently $30 per year, and Natural Resources Secretary John Griffin recommended increasing that to $90 per year.
Business groups are looking at the tax proposals – both of which have been tossed around for years – and putting together their positions on them. Neil Bergsman of the Maryland Budget and Tax Policy Institute said that he’s not going to guess what happens when all of those proposals get to the legislature for its 90-day session early next year.
“I haven’t had a lot of luck predicting what they’re going to do until 80 to 85 days into the session,” he said.
No increase in gas tax
The Blue Ribbon Commission on Maryland Transportation Funding was established by legislation to come up with recommendations for new and sustainable ways to keep funding Maryland’s transportation infrastructure. (Here is a list of its members.)
As Maryland’s road conditions and traffic tie-ups have gotten worse, state transportation finances have dwindled and federal money is certain to be cut. The commission analyzed the funds the state needed to get transportation back on track – about $870 million in new revenues – and how to get them.
The commission’s final report, which will be delivered to Gov. Martin O’Malley and the General Assembly next week, looks at a combination of tax and fee increases on transportation services. The 15-cent gas tax increase is the largest piece of the new revenues, and has generated the most discussion.
For years, business groups like the Maryland Chamber of Commerce, the Greater Washington Board of Trade, and the Greater Baltimore Committee have pushed a gas tax increase to improve transportation funding. Better transportation infrastructure makes Maryland a better place to do business, they reason. More business means a better overall economy for the state.
Ellen Valentino, the state director of the National Federation of Independent Business said she hasn’t heard any support for raising the gas tax from her members. Small businesses are struggling in the slow economy, she said.
“Right now, the priority to our members is that they want to keep their doors open,” Valentino said.
Kim Burns, president of Maryland Business for Responsive Government, said that protective measures need to be taken before a gas tax increase can be considered. The commission’s top recommendation is protecting money in the transportation trust fund, which is supposed to be used for transportation, from being redirected by the governor or legislature. Previous legislation to protect this money has been unsuccessful.
“The commission draft report acknowledges such protections are not a sure thing, but that likely won’t slow the legislature down from passing these tax increases in January without the necessary guarantees to the taxpayer,” she said in a written statement.
Increased gas tax seen reasonable
Carl Davis, a senior policy analyst with the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, said that the gas tax increased proposed by the commission is a good idea and nearly in line with some recommendations he is finalizing on a report.
Davis figured out that if the average Marylander pays 15 more cents per gallon of gas, he or she would end up paying about $78 annually in increased gas taxes. This amount of an annual increase, he said, is “absolutely reasonable” to cover the state’s transportation needs in today’s costs.
A study published earlier this year by national transportation research group TRIP reinforces Davis’ findings. It found that Maryland drivers spend an average of $2,296 annually in added maintenance, gasoline and safety precautions because of the conditions and congestion of the state’s roads. More money for transportation would help fix those problems.
“Paying about $77 a year pales in comparison with that,” Davis said.
Davis said that if the state had indexed the tax rate to construction costs back when it was last increased in 1992, it should be about 15.8 cents higher than it is now – meaning that the recommendation is on the right track.
Just don’t ignore other needs
Bergsman has fought in Annapolis for increases in other taxes, with the proceeds going to other needs. He said that he understands the proposals to increase the gasoline and “flush” taxes, and that both have been well documented through the years.
However, he said, the state has other unmet needs, specifically in education and public safety. He has championed measures like reinstating the “millionaires’ tax,” taxing services, and altering corporate income tax rates and calculations. Revenues from these kinds of increases would most likely go to the general fund, which the state uses to meet most of its needs.
Bergsman said that he wants these other tax increases – and the needs with them – to be given equal and fair consideration in Annapolis next year.
“I want us to address transportation,” he said. “I want us to address the bay. I just don’t want those two objects to suck all of the air out of the room when it comes to taxes.”
Bergsman has no trouble spending Maryland taxpayers money!
Return the funds stolen from the transportation Trust Fund by O’Malley first. Make general government more efficient and remove too many regulations.
No more taxes. Be more effictive with what you have. Maryland State Government is one of the richest states in the US.
This is liberal government covering up its own theft. The supposedly earmarked and sequestered transportation fund was one of the victims of the O’Malley budget reconciliation in the previous sessions of the General Asylum as the money laid aside was switched over to the general fund rather than doing the much harder work of streamlining government by hunting down waste. To help them, here are a few hints on reducing spending.
1. do not vest retirement to individuals using state matching funds until half of the required time of service is reached. That will eliminate retirement funding for persons who start work, are shown to be incompetent after a period of time or who move on to any other job within the state.
2. Ensure that a separate credit card report is completed and forwarded to the department heads and Directors of state operations listing the item, the cost, the credit card number used and the name of the person(s) authorizing or approving the expenditure. Demand that all travel expenditures be approved by the next senior department or division head to the person travelling, and itemizing all food, lodging and travel costs and include a signed form showing the approving individuals signature.
3. Audit each division of a department on a rotating three year basis.
4. Limit office equipment replacement to a percentage of budget with a required certification regarding the location of replacement equipment nad disposal of replaced equipment.
5. Statutory punishment of 5 years and restitution for each instance of unauthorized use of the state credit card.